KAIROS 26 – OBJECT 26

Object: T-shirt

ON Claudia Banz

Dr. Claudia Banz is an art and design scientist and since 2017 curator for design at the Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin. Previously she was head of the Department of Art and Design at the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg. As a curator, she has realised numerous exhibitions, education formats and fairs at the interface of design, fashion, crafts and art, most recently Fast Fashion. The dark side of fashion, Food Revolution 5.0. Designing for tomorrow’s society andConnecting Afro Futures. Fashion x Hair x Design. In the MKG Hamburg she was also responsible for the new presentation of the design collection. As leading curator of the Annual Fair for Arts and Crafts, she initiated an international exhibition platform for design universities and an award for young designers.

For the Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin she established the series Design Lab and Design Talks in order to open up the house as a platform and experimental space for multidisciplinary design approaches and a critical discourse on socially relevant design issues. She also researches and publishes on questions of social design (Social Design. Gestalten für die Transformation der Gesellschaft, transcript 2016) and decolonial collections.

üBer Claudia Banz

Dr. Claudia Banz ist Kunst- und Designwissenschaftlerin und seit 2017 Kuratorin für Design am Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin. Zuvor leitete sie die Abteilung Kunst und Design am Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg. Als Kuratorin realisierte sie zahlreiche Ausstellungen, Vermittlungsformate und Messen an der Schnittstelle von Design, Mode, Handwerk und Kunst, zuletzt Fast Fashion. Die Schattenseite der Mode, Food Revolution 5.0. Gestaltung für die Gesellschaft von morgen und Connecting Afro Futures. Fashion x Hair x Design. Im MKG Hamburg war sie außerdem für die Neupräsentation der Designsammlung verantwortlich. Als leitende Kuratorin der Jahresmesse für Kunst und Handwerk hat sie eine internationale Ausstellungplattform für Hochschulen und einen Nachwuchspreis für junge Gestalter initiiert.Für das Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin etablierte sie die Reihe Design Lab sowie Design Talks, um das Haus als Plattform und Experimentalraum für multidispziplinäre Designansätze und einen kritischen Diskurs über gesellschaftlich relevante Gestaltungsfragen zu öffnen. Außerdem forscht und publiziert sie zu Fragen des Social Design (Social Design. Gestalten für die Transformation der Gesellschaft, transcript 2016) und dekolonialen Sammlungen.

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 26

xxxx

KAIROS 28 – OBJECT 28

Object: Bring an object that connects (in the broadest sense)

There is always the one starting moment when excitement, opposite or aligned perspectives, the energy of two or more suddenly intersect, and the magic start towards collaboration happens.

I would like to talk about the situations and moments when we start to think and work together.
How can we start initiating cross-disciplinary collaboration? Are there objects that help the collaboration enhance and sustain? Is it even possible to work towards responsible design systems without working together? 

ON VLasta Kubusova

Vlasta Kubušová is a material designer and researcher. She holds an M.A. degree in Media Arts from Academy of Performing Arts in Bratislava (2013) and M.A. in Design from the UDK (2015). Following her collaborative master thesis, together with Miroslav Král she founded crafting plastics! studio (cp!s), an award-winning multidisciplinary material design studio. By combining science and design, cp!s revolutionizes properties, the aesthetic and values of biobased materials, and offers solutions for consumer goods and closed-loop systems in various fields. In 2018, together with material scientists, they co-created NUATAN, a material brand for bioplastic solutions for value-added products.

The studio’s projects have been presented at some of the most renowned institutions, including V&A, London Design Museum, Salone del Mobile, Rossana Orlandi Milan, Schloss Hollenegg for Design, MAK Vienna, Expo Dubai etc. Cp!s won several international prizes, including Diploma Selection (2016), Slovak National Design Award, and was nominated for German Design Award (2018 and 2021), Green Product Award (2017, 2021) Beazley Designs of the Years 2019, Dezeen Award (best-emerging studios, 2019). In 2018, Vlasta was appointed a member of the Slovak Forbes’ 30under30.

Vlasta currently continues to research biomaterial systems within her PhD studies at the Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava. She is a recipient of the Fulbright Scholarship and will conduct research in Interactive Biomaterials in collaboration with scientists and architects from UPenn, RISD and MIT. Apart from her design practice, she is also the founder and initiator of various cross-disciplinary projects, symposiums, and forums such as In the Midl Design Forum, De/posium, or Biomaterials in Practice (together with Verena Michels).

www.craftingplastics.com
www.biomaterialsinpractice.com
www.deposium.org
#crafting_plastics

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 28

xxxx

KAIROS 25 – OBJECT 25

Object: The Swiss Knife

About The Swiss Knife: (From Wikipedia)
The term „Swiss Army knife“ was coined by American soldiers after World War II after they had trouble pronouncing the German word „Offiziersmesser“, meaning „officer’s knife“.[2] The Swiss Army knife generally has a main spearpoint blade plus other blades and tools such as screwdrivers, a can opener, a saw blade, a pair of scissors, and many others. These are stowed inside the handle of the knife through a pivot point mechanism. The handle is traditionally a red color, with either a Victorinox or Wenger „cross“ logo or, for Swiss military issue knives, the coat of arms of Switzerland. Other colors, textures, and shapes have appeared over the years.
Originating in Ibach, Switzerland, the Swiss Army knife was first produced in 1891 when the Karl Elsenercompany, which later became Victorinox, won the contract to produce the Swiss Army’s Modell 1890 knife from the previous German manufacturer.

A cultural icon of Switzerland, both the design of the knife and its versatility have worldwide recognition.[3] The term „Swiss Army knife“ has acquired usage as a figure of speech indicating extreme utility applicable to more or less any scenario at hand.

ON Richard van der Laken – What Design Can DO

(From AGI – Alliants Graphique International)
Richard van der Laken is an acclaimed Dutch graphic designer, entrepreneur, initiator and on a fierceless mission as an unlikely globetrotting ambassador for the social impact of design.

His work is well known in graphic design circles. His Amsterdam design agency, Design Politie (Design Police) has shaped the cultural scene in Holland and shot to fame in the ‘90’s on a wave of interest in the Dutch design.
Today, he divides his time between designing for clients and running a global design organization called What Design Can Do. It started as a conference on the impact of design. It rapidly attracted many people to Amsterdam’s state theatre and to exhibitions at the Stedelijk Museum.
Nowadays What Design Can Do operates on a global level with partnerships in Mexico City, São Paulo, Nairobi, Delhi and Tokyo.

In his career Richard was honored with many awards and nominations, such as Red Dot, D&AD, Design Museum – Design Of The Year, ADCN (Art Directors Club Netherlands), Dutch Design Awards and more.

www.whatdesigncando.com
no-waste
www.designpolitie.nl
www.thedailygorilla.nl

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 25

xxxx

KAIROS 23 – OBJECT 23

The “Cirucluar Design Rules” are an attempt to speed up literacy of circular design within the design community and producers. It comes as a playful card deck which helps to rethink design processes.

Object to bring: Choose an object which uses “greenwashing” communication.

ON Harald Gründl

Harald is designer, design theorist and curator. He is partner at the design studio EOOS and director and founder of the IDRV – Institute of Design Research Vienna. He is specialized in the research and application of social and sustainable design strategies. 2020 EOOS has founded EOOS NEXT, a social design enterprise Harald co-leads as managing director.

He finished his habilitation in Theory and History of Design at the University of Applied Arts Vienna in 2009. He taught design theory as well as design practice at several national and international universities. 2015 and 2017 he was co-curating the Vienna Biennale for Change design exhibitions at the Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna on the topic of sustainable design. Since 2018 he has established a doctoral seminar at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna specializing on “transformative design”.

In 2021 he published the “Ciruclar Design Rules” together with Ronja Ullrich. The project was supported by the Austrian ministry for climate protection and is embedded into the “New European Bauhaus” initiative.

www.idrv.org
www.eoos.com
www.eoosnext.com

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 23

xxxx

KAIROS 22 – OBJECT 22

Object to bring: an important book for you

Mein Objekt zu einem Wendepunkt liegt lange zurück (1967): Das Buch „Ästhetische Theorie“ von Theodor W. Adorno.

ON Uta Brandes

Dr. Uta Brandes, Autorin, emeritierte Professorin für Gender & Design an der Köln International School of Design, TH Köln.
Erste Professorin, international,  die das Lehrgebiet „Gender“ im Design als erste unter dieser Bezeichnung ausübte (ab 1995). Viele Gastdozenturen u.a . in Hongkong, Hangzhou, Tokyo, Fukuoka, Sydney, New York … Mitgründerin und Vorsitzende des international Gender Design Network. Mitgründerin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Designtheorie und-Forschung. Ursprünglich Soziologin und Psychologin. Lebt in Köln.

www.be-design.info
www.genderdesign.org

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 22

xxxx

KAIROS 27- OBJECT 27

Object: a bowl

I gained an intense experience when I discovered a bowl by Bruno Munari, whose name I first encountered in 1964 during a hitchhiking trip to Italy.

As a revelation there stood this object in a shop window in Naples amidst all kinds of household knick-knacks, like a kind of bright spark. I found that recognizing the revelation in the work of another can be just as important as recognizing the revelation in yourself. You see something, you hardly dare to believe it, you don’t know exactly what you see, but you experience such a strong emotion that you are sucked in, you want to touch it, and eventually you have to own it.

Any amount would be too much for a hitchhiker who had lived for weeks on bread and tomatoes and canned sardines, with the oil acting as sunscreen. The only thing of value I had in my backpack was my camera. It brought in just enough at the pawn shop to buy the dish.

Bruno Funari Bowl, 1960

Gijs Bakker, Spotwelded Bracelet / Puntlas Armband, 1966, stainless steel, h.75 x w.85 x d.43 mm

ON Gijs bakker

Gijs Bakker (Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 1942) was trained as a jewelry and industrial designer at the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam, the Netherlands and the Konstfackskolan in Stockholm, Sweden.

His designs cover jewelry, home accessories and household appliances, furniture, interiors, public spaces and exhibitions. He worked and works for numerous companies, including Polaroid, Artifort, Droog Design, Castelijn, HEMA, Royal VKB, ENO Studio and recently as creative director for Yii, Taiwan.

Bakker taught at various schools, among which the ArtEZ Institute of the Arts in Arnhem, Delft University of Technology, and the Design Academy Eindhoven where he worked from 1987 until 2012 (since 2000 as Head of the Masters Programme). In 2016, Bakker joined as member of the Dutch Society of Arts (Akademie van Kunsten).

In 1993, Bakker co-founded Droog Design, a Dutch collective of designers, products and information. Together with Renny Ramakers, he was the selector and art director of all products within Droog Design until 2009.

In 1996, Bakker co-founded Chi ha paura…? (Italian for Who’s afraid of…?). With chp…?, the new brand name since 2013, they wanted to show the international design world that a piece of jewelry is more than a decorative fashion accessory. chp…? invites internationally acclaimed designers to create a special piece for the collection.

Gijs Bakker travels around the world to give workshops and lectures about his own work, Droog Design, chp…?, Yii /HAN gallery and is frequently a member of juries. His work is represented in both public and private collections worldwide. In 2018, Bakker received the royal distinction of Ridder in de Orde van de Nederlandse Leeuw.

In 2016 Bakker founded the MASieraad foundation together with Ruudt Peters, Ted Noten, Liesbeth den Besten, Liesbeth in’t Hout and Leo Versteijlen. MASieraad aims at the promotion of jewellery in a broad sense, through the organisation of education, workshops, lectures, exhibitions, and publications. MASieraad’s first project started at the Sandberg Institute in Amsterdam, as a temporary experimental 2-years Master called Challenging Jewellery.  In 2020 MASieraad founded the international two-years Masterclass Program MASieraad Hasselt – Amsterdam, or MASieraad H-A.

www.gijsbakker.com
#gijsbakker
www.droog.com

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 27

xxxx

xxxx

KAIROS 24- OBJECT 24

Object: a bottle of water that you can re-fill

How can we democratize solar energy? Wouldn’t it be great if we look at solar anew, and no longer see them as big rigid installations? There are plenty of ways to change the perspective and democratize solar energy. It can be small and integrated, and can be temporarily rolled out at deserted spaces for a period of time. It’s something that can be charged and shared, and you can carry it around like a bottle of water. 

ON Marjan van Aubel

Marjan van Aubel is an award-winning innovative solar designer that brings solar energy into daily life. Designing for a positive future through combining the fields of sustainability, design and technology.

The studio is creating lasting change through solar design, integrating solar power seamlessly into our environments such as in buildings and objects. With the goal to make solar power more accessible for everyone. Most notable works are Sunne, Current Table, Power Plant and the roof of the Netherlands Pavilion at the World Expo 2020 in Dubai.

Marjan has collaborated with global brands such as Cos, Timberland, Swarovski with the aim of accelerating global energy transition to solar. Graduating from the Royal College of Art (Design Products MA) in 2012 and the Rietveld Academy DesignLAB (BA) in 2009.

www.marjanvanaubel.com
solar biennale
#marjanvanaubel

Zusammenfassung 

Marjan van Aubel // Kairos 24

Key themes:
The primary focus of the seminar and Marjan’s “kairos moment” came when she was writing her dissertation on the future of colour at the Royal College of Art, London. Her research led her to solar cells that could generate energy using the “properties of colour”. Her logic followed that if glass could be a generator of power perhaps everyday objects could be designed so that they could use this technology to harness energy. What if the abundance of the sun could be harnessed through the use and existence of household objects? If this could be done the way we perceive and operate energy generation could be completely reshaped. And thus so could the world. Putting the users in direct relation and control of the energy they produce as well as consume. “A solar democracy”. It is this idea that drives Marjan’s work.

Marjan’s asked us to bring a water bottle to the seminar. This was to draw a connection between how we see water bottles today and how she envisions we could see energy in the future. A future where we would fill everyday objects with energy the same way we fill a water bottle. This reinforcing the concept of this “solar democracy” where the user of objects, i.e. the people, are in control of the energy they use and generate. This having obvious sustainability and social implications.

This new function of energy generation could operate in tandem with an objects main function but could also be completely separate/secondary to their primary use. This way nearly all objects could be transformed into implements of “solar democracy”

Early career:
When she first started work with solar generation she got in contact with Michael Grätzel, famous for the pioneering of cost effective alternatives to silicon based solar cells in the 1990’s, at the EPFL laboratory where she was able to familiarise herself with the technology. This proved to be fruitful and inspirational for her work as she had only the idea of this solar integration and no real concept of how to implement it. She said that as a designer you bring a certain naiveté that means your ideas exist outside of the realm of the logistics and technicalities that dominate those who work in the lab. Meaning that her ideas may have been impractical but they provided alternative perspectives to how to utilise the technology and thus how to develop it. An example of this naiveté would be that she wanted to design cylindrical solar cells but due to the available technology only flat cells could be produced.

Eventually after working with the dye sensitised solar cells for a time her and the rest of the solar industry realised that the technology was not suitable for the future and that they must move onto more practical technologies in order to progress. This brought up an important point that she made of being able to let go of projects that are not working and move onto to greener pastures. In her case out of this letting go she moved onto to OPV solar cells that proved to be much more applicable to her work.

Projects:
The first project briefly mentioned was “The Energy Collection” project that proposed her vision for solar democracy in its infant stage. The project was a conceptual shelf that acts as a hub/battery from which everyday objects such as glasses, plates, jugs etc. It would use dye sensitised solar cells built into their exterior to harvest and use the energy from the sun and use it as power for household objects. This project acted almost as a manifesto of her intentions and as stepping stone from which she could go begin to bring this concept to life with practical projects.

The next projects discussed were her “Current Tables”. Tables whose top surface is made of dye sensitised solar cells that act as a generator of energy for appliances that can be plugged in via a side USB port. Her thinking being that the kitchen table is a universally utilised object that would act as a suitable hub for energy generation and use. Marjan had the intention of starting a company to produce the tables but unfortunately as mentioned before the technology was realised to be inefficient and not scalable so they had to be cancelled. This project was however enormously informative for her however as it showed what producing a solar generation product would be like as well as helping her focus how she wanted to utilise the technology in the future. Namely that she realised that a table as an object would be problematic because of inherent elements. In her eyes a table would be much too stationary and cumbersome an object for individual use so she wanted something more portable to allow for a much more individualised control of one’s energy generation and use.

Her next project discussed that tackled what she diagnosed as the problem with her “current Tables” was her “cyanometer” with Swarovski, an Austrian jewellery company. She utilised their glass technology to increase the efficiency of energy generation –The glass utilised refracts light at specific angles so that it is more intensely focused onto the solar cells-. The portable solar crystal harvests the light during the day and when plugged into the docking station “gives the sensation of taking the sky indoors”. The nature of the project and working with Swarovski meant the project focused more upon utilising existing technology to make product as opposed to using the project as a means of development and experimentation which for her was informative but didn’t satisfy her drive to push the technology. She also highlighted the how the design process changed: she would simply hand over a design and the company would develop and produce the object independently. This felt quite alien to her as she was so used being hands on at every stage. In her words this way of working was almost “boring”, for her. Though she still thought it useful, as it helped her gain some perspective on how to work with a company and also give her the knowledge simply that she prefers to remain hands on throughout development.

One interesting point arose while discussing her “Power Plant” project. The project involved researched into using solar generation as a means of generating food in self-sustaining modular greenhouses. This project arose out of her returning to Holland where she noticed Holland’s large number of greenhouses. Their use harnesses the sun’s energy to produce food that helps sustain local populations. This led her to formulate the idea for the “Power Plant”. -As a side note returning to Holland from London gave her a fresh perspective on her country that she wouldn’t have noticed if she had not spent time elsewhere. A point she made was that spending time away from something or somewhere can lend a new and valuable perspective-. She then spent a year researching into this topic working with both scientist/researchers and agricultural experts to try and develop a solution. While initially enthused she ultimately ended up stepping away from the project as she felt that the agricultural sector was too profit driven. However her research and pushing of the idea helped kick start further research into this area so while she may not have been able to come to a solution she was able to spark interest and development into a new area of research. Which is valuable itself. As part of this research she had to deal with people from completely different fields whose approach to production is completely different and she emphasised how important a skill it is to be able to mediate different groups of people in order to collaborate on a solution. Related to this she also mentioned how important it is to not only imagine your ideas but create them or at least give them form so that those who cannot envision your product can begin to do so.

For her contribution to the Dutch Pavilion in Dubai at the world Expo 2020 a few interesting points were raised in terms of her approach to designing for such a brief. Marjan was chosen for the pavilion because the theme of the Dutch “Biotope” pavilion related to a self sustaining, self sufficient structure where solar energy was used to power its functions. All parts of the design were designed in a way that they could be deconstructed after the expo had concluded. For example the steel structural material was borrowed from a bridge construction company and after the expo the material was given back to be used by them. The solar panels that Marjan was responsible for also used technology that was light weight compared to her other projects so that it would be more eco friendly to have shipped to Dubai. The solar panels were also designed in a way without adhesive so that they could be separated from each other and be shipped where needed more efficiently. This approach to design gave her a new perspective on how to apply her technology in the future.

She is currently working on her “sunne” project which is a self contained light source that gets it’s power from solar energy generated during the day. She feels as though more embodies her ideal for solar democracy as its energy generation translates directly into a consistently useful functionality. This in comparison to her table projects that she felt were too impractical for individual use and her projects with Swarovski and the Dutch design pavilion that were too dependent on the whims of other people/companies. With this project she feels as though she is in full control of it’s direction. Something that she briefly mentioned was that the prototype of the object cost a lot of money and she emphasised the economy of scale and how it is important to scale your products production so that manufacturing is cheaper(If this is the intention for the project obviously). A closing point to this project was that you have to realise the multi faceted nature of product development including packaging, shipping advertising etc. Which in her words “I’m happy that I didn’t know everything as if I had known everything I wouldn’t have started”? Though she is obviously still happy and satisfied with it’s outcome. She also briefly said that she was using kickstarter in order to gather funding for the project. She thinks that kick-starter is a really useful tool in jump starting projects but she also recommended seeking guidance and help in order to use it to its fullest potential as she was aware of it’s multifaceted complexities when she first envisioned using it to fund the project.

Marjan’s Future:
Marjan was asked what her intentions are for her future work and projects and whether she will remain working exclusively with solar technology. For her the she feels a drive to do something sustainable with her work: “I’m just creating more objects into a world that has already enough objects”. And she sees working with solar technology as the best way she can help contribute to the energy transition. In terms of integrating new technology she is very open made an offhand comment about working with nano technology but she feels that working with solar has helped her focus her approach to design and helped her really find what she is passionate about making so she intends to continue forward with it.

In her opinion the most exciting new technologies include the ability to print on solar panels. While this does decrease the efficiency marginally Marjan believes that the ability for solar panels to be utilised by artists will encourage more people to enter the space and perhaps further bring solar energy and technology into the public consciousness. An example of a company using this technology is UN studio. Or also the ability to bend and curve solar panels which is being used in the “lightyear one” car. A car powered by solar cells.

Advice:
A question posed to Marjan was how she was confident enough to start a line of communication with companies in order to work with them. In her opinion there is no way around biting the bullet and simply having the confidence to step out and communicate with people. All the clients she has worked with the exception of Swarovski and the Dutch design pavilion she was the one who got in contact first. So it goes to show you need to take the initiative to be able to work with companies. Especially when first starting off. Though she stressed that you have to understand that as a designer you will most likely be misunderstood. You just mustn’t be dissuaded. You have to learn to be able to empathise with people’s perspective so that you can adapt your approach to communication and collaboration.

One point she made regarding working with companies was that companies operate differently depending on what sector they work in. For example social sector companies have a much more fluid approach to production with design, ideation and manufacture all informing each other. Usually with an intended goal in mind. Whereas technical sector companies operate more based on monetary and profit driven incentives where progress and development is fuelled by investment. This is just something that she advised us to keep in mind when working with companies as many may not be as idealistically driven as we would like. Tying into her point of how you must be adaptable and understanding of industry shortcomings in order to succeed.

Luke Deighton

KAIROS 21 – OBJECT 21

Object: drawing from when you were a child

The Kairos moment in my career was the moment I launched Clay Furniture. I’ll talk about the moment I had to choose for a direction that was an intuitively right, yet scary, path to take.
(I also have a secret second kairos moment, about which I’ll tell during the talk.)

Picture: Thomas Straub

ON MAARTEN BAAS

Maarten Baas was born in Arnsberg, Germany in 1978. From 1979, Baas grew up in the Netherlands. After graduating from high school, he began studying at the Design Academy Eindhoven in 1996. Baas is considered to be one of the most influential Dutch designers of the beginning of the 21st century. He is often described as an “author designer,” of which his works lie on the boundaries between art and design. His work is known as rebellious, playful, intellectual, theatrical and artistic. He has gained an autonomous position in the design field, and his work varies from conceptual designs, limited editions, production design, installations, public space, architecture, interior design, theater design and performances.
His works are in major museum collections, such as the MoMa, Victoria & Albert Museum, Les Arts Decoratifs, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Die Neue Sammlung, Stedelijk Museum and Rijksmuseum. And in private collections of Brad Pitt, Kanye West, Ian Schrager and Adam Lindemann. He worked for exclusive brands, such as Louis Vuitton, Swarovski, Dior, Dom Ruinart and Berluti.

www.maartenbaas.com
#maarten.baas

Zusammenfassung 

Maarten Baas // Kairos 21

The key overarching theme of the seminar was that of listening to your inner drive as a designer/artist/creator of things. He emphasised letting your instincts and intuition dictate how you work on projects. This way your work is a true reflection of yourself. It is very easy to disregard this voice or drive in favour of what is expected or popular but it is important that you nurture it so that you cultivate a sort of symbiosis with it. Its fragility means it must be reinforced with the utmost commitment. You have to believe in your work. That is why it is important to work on projects that are born out of this inner drive as without this driving force a project cannot hope to succeed.

Maarten mentioned that though you must be completely committed to a project it is only natural to doubt yourself and the project as blind commitment in a project can also lead to bad outcomes. You have to be insecure or scared of your work or you are likely on “safe ground”. Progress or a creative outcome can only arise from “unsafe ground”. You must push through the hardship in order to break new ground and develop yourself as a designer/creator.

The pre seminar task was to bring in a drawing from when you were a child. The motivation behind this task being to put you in touch with the vague memory of how you felt when you created that piece of art. How it was born out of the creative drive, which Maarten refers to, in its earliest, purest form. Untainted and free. A purity and naivety that is lost with your now experienced and weathered world view. This drive birthing a piece of art that is inherently beautiful because of what it represents. An utterly sincere and pure interpretation of the world. And it is the spontaneity and purity of this drive that Maarten tries to utilise in his work.

This naive world view cannot be fully recaptured and dwindles with age but pragmatically we may use it in combination with our new found wisdom and experience to apply a practical application to this romantic idea of a raw and free creativity. It is crucial to strike a balance between the two so that projects are beautiful and raw yet grounded.

Projects:
“Smoke”: – Maarten’s break into the design world came with his “smoke” series. For this project Maarten took classic chair designs and charcoaled them so that their exterior was entirely burnt before coating the pieces in epoxy resin to preserve their functionality. This creating an obvious incongruity in the objects of transience in opposition to preservation. This linking to nature and human nature respectively: “In nature, everything is in flux, which creates a certain beauty. Yet, it’s a very human tendency to keep things as they are supposed to be and keep them beautiful as they originally were“.

This project has a rebellious facet to its commentary. Of tearing down/burning what came before you so that you can create something new. However, while Maarten realised the rebellious aspect he stressed that the primary focus was that of the transience and preservation duality. In his eyes rebellion in design fundamentally relies on having something to kick against and is inherently negative/anti. It is nothing without what it comments on and thus is hollow in some respects.

From a more business minded and pragmatic perspective Maarten discussed how initially he saw the burning as a sort of niche within the design world he could claim for himself as a sort of calling card that would stake his claim in the design world. He also mentioned that he wanted something that he could make himself and could independently produce, allowing him greater freedom with the outcome.

“Clay”: – For Maartens follow up project “Clay “ he noted how after the success of his smoke project he felt pressure to create something that would live up to what had been built up around his new found design persona. He felt that it would have been easy for him to create a slick modern design as a follow up. But instead he decided to follow the inner child-like drive that he spoke of with the childhood drawings and follow his instincts on where to take his next project. In this case quite literally childish, but only coincidently. It was the spontaneity and intuition of the childish drive that he chased and utilised not the childlike appearance (as this is only superficial). Separate from the expectations placed on him, firmly rooted in a reflection of his true self as a designer. Namely that he made what he wanted to make. Once again he stressed that it was only possible because he believed in what he was doing and committed to it wholeheartedly. It was this realisation in his career that Maarten named as his Kairos moment and would influence the direction that the rest of his career would take

Time related projects: – Finally Maarten spoke on his various projects relating to time. None in specific but he elaborated on his apparent fascination with time in his projects. Namely the perspective that contemplating time can lend to us and it’s ability to show us what we truly value when we see our life in times shadow: “with money you can buy everything but time”. The example he gave was that of his “tree trunk chair” that uses a mould to grow a tree into the shape of a chair over the course of 200 years.

Advice:
Maarten’s advice for us as designers yet to break into the design world was to utilise our circumstances to our advantage. As a student we lack certain privileges afforded to large designers like funding or connections but we also have a much greater flexibility and freedom. As young designers we can also utilise our position to get companies to take us under their wing so to speak and help fund and collaborate with us in ways more experienced designers cannot. What Maarten really emphasised was not to be defeatist and to make the most of our situation regardless of whether it is fair. Even so you are at your most creative when you are young (again relating to the childish creative drive) and this is something that no amount of money or experience can rejuvenate.

Luke Deighton

KAIROS +1 – OBJECT +1

Object:
Bringt etwas zum Anstoßen mit.
Bring something to toast with. 

IPP – Magazine

Das letzte und ungeplante KAIROS Gespräch dieses Jahres findet am 22.2.2021 statt. An diesem Tag sind die meisten Präsentationen geschafft und wieder ein Onlinesemester vorbei. Wir wollen dieses KAIROS Gespräch dazu nutzen um gemeinsam online anzustoßen und in lockerem Rahmen das neue UdK Designmagazin zu präsentieren. Es gibt diesmal nicht nur einen Gast, sondern viele verschiedene, die an der Publikation mitgearbeitet haben, Studierende, wie Gloriana Valverde, Hendrick Lucka, Skarlett Cisneros, Tobias Trübenbacher, Alumni, wie Vlasta Kubusova, Lehrende wie Jussi Ängeslevä, Martin Beck und Maciej Chmara, nicht mehr Lehrende, wie Achim Heine und Gäste und Unterstützer von außerhalb, wie Thomas Geisler, der uns auch über den neuen Design Campus in Dresden etwas erzählen wird.

An diesem Tag gibt es ein Preview des Magazins und wir werden darüber sprechen, worin das Potential einer solchen Publikation insbesondere für die Studierenden liegt und wie man sich an der nächsten Ausgabe beteiligen kann.

IPP – Magazine

The last and unscheduled KAIROS talk of this year will take place on the 22nd of February 2021. On this day, most of the presentations will be finished and another online semester will be over. We want to use this KAIROS talk to toast together online and to present the new UdK design magazine in a relaxed atmosphere. There is not only one guest this time, but many different ones who worked on the publication. Students, like Gloriana Valverde, Hendrick Lucka, Skarlett Cisneros, Tobias Trübenbacher, alumni, like Vlasta Kubusova, lecturers, like Jussi Ängeslevä, Martin Beck and Maciej Chmara, no longer teachers, like Achim Heine and guests and supporters from outside, like Thomas Geisler, who will also tell us something about the new Design Campus in Dresden, will attend.

There will be a preview of the magazine and we will talk about what the potential of such a publication is, especially for students, and how to get involved in the next issue.

Zusammenfassung 

xxxx // Kairos 20

xxxx

xxxx

KAIROS 14 – OBJECT 14

bring: nothing, just yourself

ON Sam Hecht

Sam Hecht was born in London in 1969. His training began at the Central Saint Martins School of Art. His interest in industrial design and architecture led him to apprenticeships including David Chipperfield. Hecht thus began to define the style that characterises his personality as a designer. A profound search for the essential, acute observation of the world we live in and a belief that simplicity can be inspirational. In 1993 he completed his masters at the Royal College of Art, followed by 3 years in California with Ideo, and 3 years in Tokyo. This period involved the collaborations with Naoto Fukasawa, producing some startling product typologies over the course of 6 years.

In 2002, he co—founded Industrial Facility with his partner Kim Colin. He began to work with Manufacturers, and the number of clients increased in just a few years. For Muji Japan he created the “Second Phone” (2004), which led to him being invited to become retained designer for World Muji. For Taylor’s Eye Witness, a Sheffield company, he also became main designer producing notable sequels to Robert Welch’s work, selected for the Museum fűr Kunsthandwerk, Frankfurt and awarded the Design Plus and of Gold Prize for 2006. More recently he has been appointed design advisor to Herman Miller. Between 2006 — 10, he acted as senior tutor at the Royal College of Art, London, forming Platform 12 and in 2011 was appointed visiting professor of HFG Karlsruhe in Germany. in 2010 he was awarded the ‘Designs of the Year’ for the Branca chair.

www.industrialfacility.co.uk

Zusammenfassung 

Sam Hecht (Industrial Facility)  // Kairos 14

Sam Hecht had several KAIROS moments in life. He thought that he knew everything before studying his master at RCA. He was a designer with skills. For him, a master degree turned out to be about being individual, finding your own identity to choose your own career. The school provided space to be able to develop yourself as a person. It challenged him intellectually and stretched his knowledge. After his studies, he became an intellectually skilled designer.
And another KAIROS moment in his life was when he was in California, USA. Again, he thought he knew everything. But there were so many people who were better than him, and knew so much more about design. He read a lot and was matured by bright people around him. Then he realized that delivering consumption products for selling won’t satisfy him. He started to question it, can I make it better for other people?

After years of experience in the subject of design, he set up his studio called “industrial facility”. He wanted to have the name with no meaning, friendly, anonymous and neutral atmosphere. There weren’t particular strategies behind it but he could communicated with companies that were interesting. After 20 years later, he still doesn’t have a fixed strategy, but he is ready and prepared for clients.

Unlike artists, designers dependent on industry. A start was a big challenge but he continuously, discussed ideas with companies and then got connected with MUJI. Including MUJI, the studio has a long-term close relationship with the companies that they work with. Which means they have better chance to make things better and better.

Sam figures his practice at his studio like a Jazz band. It’s definitely not an orchestra. Firstly, A Jazz band doesn’t need many musicians. Very good musicians play their part their best, yet the fundamental thread of idea runs through. If someone else has better ideas over details, it is important to be respected, analyzed and contemplated. It needs courage to realize the Jazz type of concept. If he needs drums, he lets it flow. Sam is very humble to enjoy challenges, and trying to appreciate it. He still thinks he knows everything know but it is not easy, and it can be tough to be accepted by the clients the and to get better.

Sam works not only on commission with his studio, but also his self-initiates work including books and his future-facility projects. What interests him in the self-initiated projects is networked products for the future. Selling singular products are not relevant today. Products that are connected with networks are the future and we have to be aware of what they are capable of. Connected on the network means consumers are agreed to provide their data which can be used multiple ways without their consent. Todays Designers must get involved to the ability of what networked products can do.

He is always interested in good values, reliable, repairable, beautiful and relevant things and likes to get involved in it. For example his medical projects, he had to learn a lot as a designer and understand the particular situation around it well, to make it better.
Making things better is not just about better materials. It is about the customers who buy it, quality of thoughts, attachments, engagement and relationship. It is something you feel real pleasure about. Sometimes it is hidden nor not visible and people start only to realize while using it. Discovery that is the wonderful thing.

There are many good designers out there. But not all of them can their foot in the door and get established. Industrial design is a particular subject which is limits and difficult. Education can widen the attention to the subject of design.
Sam ends with the answer a question by Fiona Raby who listens in and shared office with Industrial Facility in the beginning of their careers. His self-initiative projects along with studio works are still ongoing. He is still ‘making’ all the time, everyday and Sam said the most important the sentence, “making never stops”. He ‘makes’ in analog ways to create better a connection with him and then making process gradually starts to form itself. He enjoys it. He enjoys to stand back.

Sanghyeok Lee

KAIROS 20 – OBJECT 20

Object: Licht / Leuchte

Entscheidende und wegweisende Momente gibt es viele im Leben und in der Karriere.
Unser erstes gemeinsames Projekt war ein Wettbewerb für die Gestaltung und Realisierung eines Messestandes. Das Thema hieß „Simple Light“ und es sollten Leuchtenprojekte der Studierenden auf der Tendence 2007 präsentiert werden. Das Projekt war die Feuertaufe für unsere Zusammenarbeit und wurde das Fundament für unser Studio.

ON Besau-Marguerre

Studio Besau-Marguerre ist ein Interdisziplinäres Designstudio im Herzen von Hamburg, das mit einem ganzheitlichen Gestaltungsansatz übergreifend in den Bereichen Produktionsdesign, Visuelle Kommunikation, Styling und Innenarchitektur tätig ist.
2011 von Eva Marguerre und Marcel Besaß gegründet, umfaßt ihr Team heute Innenarchitekten, Textildesign, Grafikdesigner und Produktdesign, mit denen Spannende Messe-Konzepte bis hin zu umfangreicheren Projekten wie die Möblierung der Hamburger Elbphilharmonie umgesetzt werden. Mit einem feinen Gespür für ausgefallene Farben, Experimentelle Formen un ungewöhnliche Materialien und viel Liebe zum Detail, entwirft Studio Besaß-Marguerre individuelle Konzepte, die Dank der vielseitigen Expertise des Teams eine Ganzheitliche Markenberatung und ineinandergreifende Konzeptumsetzung aus einer Hand Ermöglichen. Ausgangspunkt der Gestalterischen Arbeit eines jeden Projektes ist stets das Produkt Selbst, für dessen Entwurf das Interieur von Beginn an mitgedacht sowie dessen übergeordnete Wahrnehmung zur Zielsetzung wird. Die Fertigung von Prototypen in Handarbeit gehört dabei ebenso dazu wie die Nutzung digitaler Designtools

www.besau-marguerre.de
#studiobesaumarguerre

Zusammenfassung 

Besau-Margueare // Kairos 20

KAIROS 19 – OBJECT 19

Als Kairos könnte man wohl den 8. Juli 1999 bezeichnen. Das war der Tag, an dem ich in der Torstrasse 68 in Berlin-Mitte meine erste MOEBEL HORZON Filiale eröffnete.

Günstig war der Ort (Torstrasse, damals noch sehr günstig), der Zeitpunkt (siehe vorherige Klammer), die Jahreszeit (Sommer) und die Uhrzeit (abends). Schnell entstand die grösste Eröffnungsgala, die Berlin je gesehen hatte. Noch wichtiger war aber, dass ich an diesem Tag meinen ersten selbstdesignten Gegenstand präsentierte, das Universalregal „Modern“. Und am allerwichtigsten war, dass an diesem Abend 20 dieser Regale bestellt wurden. Der Anfang meiner erfolgreichen Laufbahn als Designer und Unternehmer!

objekt: ein Bild von dir vor ein regal / an image of you in front of a shelf

ON Rafael Horzon

Rafael Horzon studierte Philosophie, Latein und Atomphysik in Paris, München und Berlin, bevor er 1996 als Fahrer in den Paket-Dienst der Deutschen Post wechselte.

Seit 1997 Gründung zahlreicher Unternehmen, darunter das Möbelhaus Moebel Horzon, Horzon’s Spülen Sparadies und Horzons Wanddekorationsobjekte.

2010 veröffentlichte Horzon seinen autobiografischen Bestseller „Das Weisse Buch“, der in zahlreiche Sprachen übersetzt wurde.

2018 wurde Horzons Gesamtwerk als Designer vom Vitra Design Museum angekauft, er gilt seitdem als „wohl wichtigster lebender Designer“ (Designmagazin DEAR).

Im September 2018 eröffnete Horzon in Berlin das Deutsche Zentrum für Dokumentarfotografie, 2019 den Fachmarkt „ Horzons Dämm & Deko“. Im Oktober 2020 erschien „Das Neue Buch“ von Rafael Horzon im Suhrkamp Verlag.

www.horzon.de

Zusammenfassung 

Rafael Hormon // Kairos 19

Rafeal Horzon was introduced on our KAIROS page as „probably one of the most important living designers“. Very propably, some students felt that they had not seen him among the classic design icons until now. This is already the first mischievous twist of many that we have heard in the course of our conversation with Rafael about his person. Since he only created 4 designs in his career, and 2 were taken over by the vitra design museum, he can, by usual rules, call himself as probably one of the most important living designers.
His way of communicating and working was the first point of discussion in our talk. Axel describes his tireless source of humour as a trick to be able to constantly reinvent something using the leverage of humour to take existing things in the world, turn them upside down and make something new out of them.

Rafael cites his ‘Wanddekorationsobjekte’ (engl.: wall decoration objects) made of coloured plexiglass strips, as also used by Anselm Reile in a work of art. If you call these strip paintings wall decoration objects rather than works of art, they become something completely different. So perhaps it simply depends on how you talk about things.
A similar thing happened with his gallery Berlin Tokyo in 1996, where he tested the system of art and whether it would really be so easy to hang simple objects, such as a Japanese packet of crisps, on the wall and declare it to be art and then have it be perceived as such. He exposed the system of art by undermining it. Axel concludes that this twisting is a typical means of humour and leads to awareness. Axel therefore finds that his approach is not a joke, but political design. Existing values that we deal with are made to tilt and Horzon keeps this tilt in a fragile balance that is very interesting in Axel’s eyes.

With his first product, a shelving system, and his company Möbel Horzon, Rafael is pursuing an age-old principle in Axel’s eyes: urban local production, a system of industrially produced semi-finished products that are brought to the point of sale without middlemen and personal contact to the clients.Doing this, he feeds a certain culture, then invests in a new idea, and a never-ending well of a bread-and-butter principle emerges.
Rafale says it was all completely unplanned, that he still has no idea of the processes that product designers go through, and that he thinks a system like middlemen should be overturned anyway. As designers, we have to think more simply – He needed a shelf himself, bought MDF boards at Obi and screwed them together. He then placed this shelf as the only object in a completely empty shop on Torstraße and had ‚the biggest and most beautiful opening gala Berlin had seen up to then‘.

It was interesting to listen to the self-evidence, almost audacity, with which Horzon detaches himself from existing systems in his projects, simplifies them, often makes fun of them and thus also points out absurdities in the systems with clarity. Many things simply don’t make sense the way they are handled and he does it differently.
For example, with his company Redesign Deutschland, founded in 2001, he has redesigned language and time calculation – a grammar consisting of 10 rules and time calculation in a decimal system (1000 days, 100 hours, 100 minutes, etc.).

If Horzon has to describe a strategy for becoming a successful designer: You shouldn’t have a strategy. You should try to have as much fun as possible and just go for it, try things out and don’t wait for a brief or an assignment. Have ideas, hold on to them and then, and this is the most important point, implement them! For him it was always important to have a place to try things out and see if it works without getting into debt. ‚Very important!‘
On this point he had good news for us: many shops in Berlin are empty due to the Corona situation and are cheaper again. There, something can move and they show a possibility to do interesting things without investing a lot of money. In his eyes, a shop has a completely different effect than a website. Besides, you can’t lose much and you can only take away good conversations, great opening galas and interesting experiences.

This brought us to the topic of design fairs, which Horzon has never been to – he doesn’t see the point. Nevertheless, he has direct ideas about the future of the fairs. If he were us, he would get together with others and simply set up a fair in Berlin himself, create a platform. It couldn’t be that difficult, others have done it too. In his opinion, we have to think in a deglobalised way today. You could really tell how clearly and simply he approaches things and how naturally he would implement them.

The talk with Rafael Horzon brings mixed feelings. With his work, he naturally criticises part of design and art, but he also reminds us as designers not to think in an unnecessarily complicated way and actually to do things.
Horzon sums it up very simply: if you have written a novel and you leave it in the drawer, it doesn’t exist. You have to go out with it. Otherwise, what you have created doesn’t exist either.

With a final word to us, he comes back to the shops: every crisis is also a time of change!

Kim Kuhl

KAIROS 18 – OBJECT 18

object to bring: teapot/coffeepot

ON Mateo Kries

Dr. Mateo Kries (*1974) ist seit 2011 Direktor des Vitra Design Museums. Er studierte Kunstgeschichte und Soziologie an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und begann seine Museumskarriere 1994/95 mit einem Volontariat im Museum für Berberkultur in Marrakech.
1995 kam er zum Vitra Design Museum, wo er bis 2000 als Kurator tätig war. Dann übernahm er die Leitung der Berliner Niederlassung des Vitra Design Museums und war ab 2006 als Chefkurator des Museums tätig. Während dieser Zeit verantwortete er zahlreiche Ausstellungen und war Mitbegründer des Berliner DESIGNMAI-Festivals.
Mateo Kries ist der Autor verschiedener Bücher und Artikel über Architektur- und Designgrößen wie Le Corbusier, Joe Colombo oder Konstantin Grcic, aber auch über Themen wie Design und Surrealismus oder Entwicklungen im nicht-westlichen Design. Er publiziert Artikel über Design und Architektur u.a. in Die Welt und domus und ist regelmäßig Mitglied in Jurys und Berufungskommissionen.
Im Jahr 2010 erschien sein Buch »Total Design – Die Inflation moderner Gestaltung«, in dem er aktuelle Wahrnehmungen von Design kritisch in den Blick nimmt. Mateo Kries ist Mitherausgeber des »Atlas des Möbeldesigns« (2019), derumfassendsten Publikation, die je zu diesem Thema publiziert wurde.

www.design-museum.de
#mateokries

Zusammenfassung 

Mateo Kries // Kairos 18

KAIROS 17 – OBJECT 17

das objekt: eine Teetasse
the object: a teacup

Ich glaube, dass man die Dinge nicht zwingen kann. Man muss abwarten. Deshalb trinke ich gerne Tee. Zum Teetrinken braucht man eine Teetasse. Man kann Tee auch aus einem Glas oder einer Kaffeetasse trinken, aber ich bevorzuge eine Teetasse. Mein Objekt ist deshalb eine Teetasse. Ich hatte auch das Glück, einmal ein Teeservice (um-)gestalten zu dürfen. Praktischerweise ist also die Teetasse eine, die von mir (mit-)gestaltet ist. In diesem Teeservice kommen zwei sehr verschiedene Designtraditionen zusammen: Die minimalistische Eleganz der klassischen Moderne, hier vertreten durch Trude Petri, und Enzo Mari, den man so schwer einordnen kann, außer, dass er alles radikal anders macht. In seinem Teeservice hat er alles umgedreht und das ist schon sehr lustig. Außerdem hat das Teeservice einen dysfunktionalen Goldrand und ein hysterisches Dekor. Das habe ich zu verantworten.

ON Friedrich von Borries

Ich heiße Friedrich von Borries, habe Architektur studiert und bin jetzt Professor für Designtheorie an der HFBK Hamburg. Ich beschäftige mich mit dem Verhältnis von Gestaltung und Gesellschaft, weil ich immer noch hoffe, dass man eine »bessere Welt« entwerfen kann. Ich lebe in Berlin und manchmal Havelberg. Die meiste Zeit denke ich, manchmal schreibe ich und manchmal rede ich. Sehr viel mehr gibt es, glaube ich, erstmal nicht zu sagen.

—

Friedrich von Borries is Architect and Professor für Designtheorie at Hochschule für bildende Künste in Hamburg and as such he wrote numerous texts on design and design politics.
His project School of no consequences – exercises for a new life is on show till 9. May in Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe in Hamburg. As part of an educational programme he introduced the Scholarship for Doing Nothing.

www.friedrichvonborries.de

Zusammenfassung 

Friedrich von Borries // Kairos 17

A very inspiring talk with Friedrich von Borries, who discusses the concept of design, the role of the designer and the function of design with us.

Friedrich von Borries explains Kairos moments as coincidences in life and moments in which topics, you already deal with, appear condensed– You suddenly see something where everything you are dealing with comes together.
This is also how he arrived at the topic of his promotional work, which he describes as his first Kairos. Having walked around the city, he spotted by Nike branded sports fields in Berlin which lead him to the topic of marketing strategies in urban space and covered design, architecture and urban planning at the same time.
He sees another Kairos in Axel, who offered him, as an architect, a teaching position in design at Udk. Axel was the one explaining him that he was clearly doing design theory. Today, Friedrich works as a design theorist.

The object he asked us to bring is a teacup, which also reflects for him what his work is about.
It is in ‚Abwarten und Teetrinken‘ (engl.: wait and see) that his ideas emerge. For him, this moment of eating and seeing also implies a deep trust that things will come as they should. In his RLF project, the teacup also played an important role and he was once allowed to design the surface of a teacup in a project with KPM. For him, like his work, this object covers a theoretical part, a design part and an artistic part and different disciplinary approaches come together.

Axel made then several references to ‚Abwarten und Tee trinken‘ (engl.: wait and see): Firstly a possible ‘Folgenlosigkeit’ (engl.: non-consequence)– with which he addresses Friedrich von Borries‘ ‘Schule der Folgenlosigkeit’ (engl.: School of no consequences) and the scholarship he awarded for doing nothing– and secondly he addresses ‘das Entwerfen’ (engl.: designing) and the implied speed inherent in ‚werfen‘.
Friedrichs way of responding to this gave us a hint of his way of thinking and analyzing.
For Friedrich, designing is not necessarily to be understood as fast. Linguistically, the ‚Ent‘ in ‚Entwerfen‘ even describes something withdrawing, a movement that does not just go straight ahead and fast, as ‚werfen‘ would describe it. This also brings him to ‚verwerfen‘ (egal.: discarding), which is an exercise that he believes we all need to cultivate and learn, especially at university.
That, in turn, has to do with what he discusses under ‚Folgenlosigkeit‘. Doing nothing, refraining from doing something, and also that it can be nice to refrain from doing things. Why just doing nothing is so difficult for many people, for Friedrich, refers to the fact that it is not part of our culture of thinking. We would mostly think in terms of success making it difficult to think the opposite.

In the ‚Schule der Folgenlosigkeit‘, he often encounters contradictions striving for being with no consequences, but at the same time initiating steps that lead to success and thus not remain with no consequences. That’s why, in his eyes, it’s conceptually coherent that the exhibition in Hamburg on this project remains, due to corona, closed. Even if it never opened, it would be coherent.
The current time for the exhibition also fits: it makes us think about our consequences in a different way: every meeting has consequences at the moment, we are in a kind of marathon of consequences that we have never known before. For Friedrich, in this respect, the project fits in very well with the times.
Friedrich mentioned a quite expressive quote of climate activist Tadzio Müller which also became his personal leitmotif for the project: We have to make very consequential decisions now in order to be able to live a non-consequence life someday. This contradiction is very central and important for our time, he said.

When Ineke asked what decisions these could be in his eyes, Borries replied that he was not a missionary type and did not want to give instructions, not even in his books. He always tries to stimulate, to get discussions going and to provoke reactions. He recognises himself in the role of a provocateur. But he also sees himself in the role of a moderator in projects, which, as the opposite of the provocateur, is usually not visible and therefore not so quickly associated with him.

Friedrich prefers to see his work as a broad concept of design: He can combine different disciplines in a meaningful way. what brings us back to the moderator. He shows us a very central function of design: linking and creating synergies. He also avoids giving himself a disciplinary term like ‚architect‘ or author and prefers to describe himself as ’sub-disciplinary‘ or as a process designer knowing what he is good at: developing concepts, writing texts, linking contacts.
It was very nice to observe how clear Friedrich defines himself and his work without assigning to a specific discipline.

On the subject of Kairos, Friedrich concludes: you can only seize opportunities if you always remain open to the fact that everything could always turn out differently. That is a very important basic attitude, without which such moments,like Kairos moments, cannot reveal themselves.

Kim Kuhl

KAIROS 16 – OBJECT 16

object: a pen

Kairos moments. I’ve had many of them. Small ones, larger ones. The moment you listen less to what you think you should do or what you think other people expect of you the more Kairos comes to visit. I used to be a lousy Design Academy student. I was very young and trained in secondary school to do what I was being told. Not to explore by myself. After I was almost kicked out of the academy I decided to try one more time and now only do what I wanted to do. This is when I found food.

ON Marije Vogelzang

Zusammenfassung 

Marije Vogelsang // Kairos 16

KAIROS 15 – OBJECT 15

object to bring: … create or post a grafic behind you …preferable large & colourful

Theme to discuss: IMPACT
… how can relevance be generated
… by designers?
… what is relevant today in terms of civilization?
… what would be the equivalent of the ‚Whole Earth Catalog‘ in 2021 …?
… can there be a meaningful ‚counterculture‘ …?

ON Werner Aisslinger

Werner Aisslinger graduated from UdK product design and has set up a very successful office for product and interior design in Berlin.

His works cover the spectrum of experimental, artistic approaches, including product design and architecture.
He delights in making use of the latest technologies and has helped introduce new materials and techniques to the world of design. His visionary products and spaces explore civilisation related and futuristic topics. Werner Aisslinger’s ‚loftcube’–project became one of the most discussed modular and transportable housing projects within the last years, his ‚hemp chair‘ from 2012 developed with BASF and Moroso was the worldwide first biocomposite Monobloc chair. His work is exhibited in the permanent collections of international museums such as the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the Metropolitan Museum in New York, the French Fonds National d’Art Contemporain in Paris, the Victora & Albert Museum London or the Museum Neue Sammlung, The Design Museum in Munich, and the Vitra Design Museum in Weil, Germany.

In 2013 Werner Aisslinger opened his first solo-show called ‚Home of the Future‘ in Berlin’s Museum ‚Haus am Waldsee‘. In 2014 he was awarded the prestigious AW Designer of the Year Award in Cologne. In 2017 he opened his exhibition ‚House of wonders‘ in the Museum Pinakothek der Moderne in Munich. Among studio aisslingers interior architecture projects his hotels for the 25hours Hotel group and shopping malls for the Central Group in Bangkok are known for an innovative storytelling concept. He works for brands like Vitra, Moroso, Cappellini, Dedon, Accor, Magis, Hansgrohe Axor, Kaldewei, Foscarini & Waestberg. Werner Aisslinger lives and works in Berlin with a second studio in Singapore.

www.aisslinger.de

Zusammenfassung 

Werner Aisslinger // Kairos 15

The talk with Werner Aisslinger represented the concept of our casual talk series KAIROS pretty good: Since Axel Kufus and Werner Aisslinger have known each other for over 30 years and Axel, Werner and Ineke come more or less from the same generation of design, the conversation between them was quite personal.

Together they were able to present a different generation of design to us students, compared it to our current world of design and discussed themes like the designer’s role and relevance today, the systems and structures in which we operate and how they have changed over time.

The given introduction about Werner Aisslinger ended and thus our talk started with his quote: ‘Das Leben ist eine Collage.’ (engl.: Life is a collage.)
Werner talks about his impression that we live in a world where patchwork is commonplace- be it patchwork families or even representational worlds, where different spaces and objects come together. We don’t talk about styles so much anymore in our time, neither in art, nor in design or architecture. Styles intermingle, like a patchwork, and new symbioses are created. The designer is now more of a curator or a DJ who has mastered the art of developing a collage from these styles and making sure that everything comes together well.

Coincidentally fitting the theme ‘collage’, his ‚object‘, which we were to bring with us, was a colourful flat background – digital or analogue.

An important moment in his life was certainly meeting Axel, so Werner Aisslinger. Through him he met Andreas Brandolini, and through him Jasper Morrison, and through him James Irvine, and then he got a job in Milan. ‘There are those ‚lucky punches‘ in life that get you ahead’. But performance is always important, without that nothing will happen, of course.

For Ineke, also his work has always been ‚collage‘ – from hardcore industrial design to experimental projects like his hemp chair. She asked if he was also sometimes insecure when people assumed that he did not know where he wanted to go. Werner Aisslinger said he did not care as much how it is seen from the outside, there are always projects with less and more response. He made it clear that as designers, we are never completely free, especially after university. We have to work in a construct and there is always a ping-pong player. He gave us an enlightening insight into his company work and dichotomies in which one moves : 30 people working on 30 interior projects + 15 design projects + by side research- and conceptual projects, that sounds like a lot! Running a commercial office is a challenge for itself, but he likes to also work on experimental non profit projects of which some he thought were insane to do, with so much effort and little of his own profit. But apart of the commercial, it is also about creating things that not only fulfil the order, but also have a future, a message and a concept.

He wondered if we also discuss the economic aspects in uni – the licence-based product designer culture is becoming more and more difficult and reckless in his view.
Coming from the generation of ‘author-designers’ / independent designers, who have mainly created furniture, lighting and interiors in their name, he pointed out that the setting has changed. The job of the independent product creator has become more difficult. Even if he somehow misses the ’nerd hours‘ in the basement in university with hours of model building, he is glad that he is now working with several parties in a network. And there again, a collage is created by you being one of the players in a larger project and by finding a compromise of a way somewhere.
Ineke gave us another collage picture: design is like making a sudoku: there are many numbers that have to be fitted into a collage, and these numbers can be haptics, emotions, functionalities, costs, customers, love, impossible aspects…

Today, with digitalisation moving forward, spaces must for example also function via social media, this is a new part of the briefing. Werner Aisslinger wonders whether we see ourselves more in the digital world or whether there is also a counter culture: the longing for real spaces. He thinks analogue spaces are definitely more important than digital ones, civilisation-wise. He also appeals to clients that right now they have to create a real social experience. We can create spaces that bring people together and make them happy – through spaces, objects, surfaces, materials and haptics. In his eyes, this can touch people more than digital surfaces.
Is there a revival of the suppressed analogue? This is a popular discussion point for him.

To the question of how we as designers can generate relevance, Aisslinger answers: with experimental projects that make a statement!
He encouraged us not to wait until we are hired as a designer but to turn an idea into a business, noting that besides skill and creativity, there is also the willingness to take risks and entrepreneurship to get somewhere. But in his view, however, we live in golden times to start a company having the opportunity to find investors by putting our concept on various platforms to test our idea.

At the last question, whether they would do anything differently if they could turn back time, Werner Aisslinger again addressed the generation difference. He, for his time, would not do anything differently and is very happy with his way of work life. But he emphasises that this wouldn’t work as a template for our generation as so many things have changed. ‘The time of author design is over!’.
Ineke also thinks every generation has to do things differently- now, we have to show action, show responsibility, take risks, know what we want to do in design, and show role models.
And Axel said that ‚we are in a transformation process, […] creating good solutions between prosperity and circularity is an insane task for design!‘. Functionalities, emotionalities and world compatibilities now come together and require so much smarter action, which we must be prepared to take.

Werner left us with the ‘Whole Earth Catalog‘, a wild collection of future scenarios, and the thought, that in every generation there is a tomorrow that we help to shape.
He thinks that the exciting thing about our profession is how we can be part of the development of civilisation and how we can help shaping the future. Because designers produce the tomorrow, the visionary.

Kim Kuhl

KAIROS 13 – OBJECT 13

bring: An object that allows you to see/experience something invisible
(invisible in its most broadest terms)

Realists of a Larger Reality; (Ursula Le Guin)
Perhaps the only futures worth considering now are unlikely ones? Maybe we need more of them? Design’s current methodologies prepare us for the probable, and as we have seen, this may not be enough.  Perhaps we need to be more comfortable with the unlikely, improbable and barely imaginable.

The impossible can become the new possible —  just because something is impossible does not mean it is not possible. Perhaps less linear design processes can allow for wider influences and reference points providing a richer pool of cultural nutrients — perhaps then more humane realities can begin to emerge…,

ON Fiona Raby

Fiona is University Professor of Design and Social Inquiry and Co-director of the Designed Realities Studio at The New School in New York. She is also a partner in the design studio Dunne & Raby (1994-).

She was Professor of Industrial Design (id2) at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna between 2011-2016 and was Reader in Design Interactions at the RCA between 2005-2015. Her projects with Anthony include Technological Dream Series, No 1: Robots (2007), Designs For An Over Populated Planet: Foragers (2010), The United Micro Kingdoms (2013), The School of Constructed Realities (2015), and An Archive of Impossible Objects (2019 -).  She was a founding member of the CRD Research Studio at the Royal College of Art where she worked as a Senior Research Fellow leading externally funded research projects. She taught in the Architecture department for over 13 years; ADS04 is the longest running unit, now 19 years old.

www.dunneandraby.co.uk
www.designedrealities.org

sneak preview of
coming up:
C & D

Zusammenfassung 

Fiona Raby (Dunne & Raby) // Kairos 13

What and interesting talk with Fiona Raby, full of input!
Fiona Raby and Anthony Dunne from Dunne & Raby are propably the “godfathers of speculative design” provocing different ways of thinking about the relativity of our reality and future.
Working 30 years together with Anthony Dunne, Fiona pointed out that it’s hard to speak for herself why she will talk for Anthony and her both.

Their Kairos has been more like a longer lasting ‘moment’. It was their 3 years stay in Tokyo, Japan, when they left college in 1988. The there so different world and attitude towards technology ‘shifted [their] world in a big way’ and has had not only a profound effect on their then following work but even on what they do now.
Coming from a world, the UK, where technology is seen as something controlling, they experienced technology in Tokyo as something delightful and with pleasure. This, they wanted to turn into something of their ownwhen they went back to the UK and thought about it within their familiar context.

From then on they were falling between disciplines, says Fiona. Not really industrial design, nor architecture, nor graphics. They started a computer related design course in 1991. Even that they were interested in technologies then, they felt like misfits and as if they wouldn’t quite fit in. ‘It was a funny course’, she said having done it with a real mixture of people from different departments who were all, kind of working in the technological space.

The object this week was quite interesting for us participants to bring with: An object that allows you to see/experience something invisible! That’s why there were a huge range of different objects in our webex gathering, which all understood visible and invisible in different ways – book, heart, thermometer, sleeping mask, glasses, …
Unfortunately, Fiona hadn’t got her object with her in New York because it is located in London. But she sent us a link to her radioscanner, she bought it at a shop after coming back from Japan. She said it was fascinating to have had the possibility to tune into a really different world of all kind of signals in the air.
Through this, they wanted to think about smart objects and it also led to an early book and project, the ‘placebo project’.

Fiona told that after having worked as research fellows, she and Tony started teaching and working with a range of digital companies, they are still falling between the gaps today, in this in between space. ‘We sit in this funny world between institutions, academia and practice, this space in between all of these things.’. They see their work as a research in design, to push boundaries of what design could be and how technology fits into this.

Their famous book ‘Speculative Design’ marks the 10 years they spent at Design Interactions the mastercourse they ran at the RCA trying to understand biotechnology.
‘But you can’t make these biological things!’, said Fiona. So the book is about how can we make things that don’t exist? how can we show that they exist? And how to speculate on if this technology is getting developped? What would the everyday life would be like with this lense of technology?

Then Fiona talked about the power of models and prototypes. Perhaps their background as architects has fed this too, but in design you usually work on 1:1 prototypes. An interesting point, Fiona pointed out, is that a 1:1 scale automatically assumes that it is real and that it exists in a real world. But sometimes you make an object that has no connection with the real world but it is used to talk about that world that it is supposed to be in. For this, they love using models.

In doing so, Fiona mentions that they ask themselves what is the value of the conceptual way of thinking? It is about using design to ask questions and create discussions?! As soon as an object exists in a 3 dimensional space, it becomes a very powerful tool to talk about things that don’t exist yet. But there is also a lot of research behind this! ‘If you don’t have that research and don’t know your facts, it’s very difficult to make a powerful piece of design that challenges!’

During the discussion, Axel and Fiona also adressed the multiple realites which we experience today, especially in the crisis. Fiona asked herself how to work with this kind of space. She thinks it is kind of fascinating and what design does – working with multiple viewpoints. Axel wondered if it would be good to create an inflation by creating more and more narratives, so people have more possibilities following things. Fiona responded that there already is ‘more and more’, but they are all in the same kind of space why it is important to step outside the unknown world and do something completely different.

This led over to the topic of their new book: How to explore the unknown? It is half way writing and still needs time until being published, but it builds on the work they already did.
In the context of the book, they are interested in what is impossible and why is it impossible? They also analyse belief systems from the past and present. Now, there is not anymore the certainty about technology that saves us, we are living in a world of contradiction.
‘It is a lovely balance between the rational and the irrational.’ Finding the balance through lightness, sensitivity and by using the synthesis in a world of multiple realities can be seen as a classic design task. Fiona emphazises that ‘This is a real struggle […] but who said design is easy?’

In the last part of the discussion we talked about the role of speculative design in a context of a world and society that feel real problems.
Fiona said that design is not gonna save us, but it can help us when having other ingredients like other institutions. We have to keep in mind the picture of an ecology: Each little piece can help the bigger picture and design is one piece of the ecology – people use structures of design to shape the world: thinking outside, thinking broader, seeing another perspective.

And another thing Fiona has learned and what concluded the talk nicely: People want to have bigger dreams and dreams about what it could be. Speculative design pushes the dream further by pushing to edges and expanding realities.

Kim Kuhl

KAIROS 12 – OBJECT 12

Bring: a small, heavy, formally interesting object that can be used as a paperweight (and if available ink, a pile of A4 paper and a dip pen)

ON Birgit lohmann

Zusammenfassung 

Birgit Lohmann // Kairos 12

Birgit Lohamnn is the founder of Designboom, based in Milan, Italy. She studied design and was living and working with Italian architects and designers in Italy. She is the pioneer of the online design publishing platform called Designboom that started in 1999.

One of her great stories was about her relationship with Enzo Mari who recently died. She worked on a number of projects with him, such as a cooperation with KPM Berlin. Enzo Mari influenced her a lot.
Enzo Mari believed that design is not a game or play. Design is the hard work. Probably it’s the toughest works and it needs huge amount of work. So he believed that one has to be efficient on decision making. Birgit emphasized it by citing Mr. Mari’s words. To be efficient, drawings are more helpful than writing. Before finding the right sketches, one need to sketch a lot to reduce his/her stress.

Birgit’s KAIROS moment and object has to do with this. A paperweight can calm down the sketching process. A paperweight gives time to think. With a paperweight on it a pile of sketches get some piece and you can think. If you make just one sketch on one piece of paper you can throw bad sketches a way and keep good ones longer for your design research.

A design process starts with personal experience or emotions. Which is great to start with but in the end, it needs higher level of quality with some sort of scientific research. Scientific order is necessary. The paperweight can trigger to make piles and to make order, to make a break and look deep into your process.

Ineke asked about the founding reason of Designboom while Birgit was working with great Italian names.
Birgit’s dream was to become a designer, but she was frustrated by the short time to finish one project. She again emphasized on time you have to take for design projects. After school, she wanted to something else. Despite that Enzo Mari’s design office worked differently than others, for her it was the same job differently.
She was frustrated that young designers, who came up with ideas to design offices, often heard ‘no’ to their design suggestions. So, publishing their ideas was something she came up with.
Enzo was against the online platform since he was not in favour of internet in the beginning. But Enzo realised he was wrong at the end. Designboom was a success.
Birgit still doesn’t want to place critics on projects or ideas. Because the nice projects or ideas took lots of time and effort. We, as an audience, can discuss it later. Her job is to publish (young) people’s ideas.

Axel asked about the shortcut to succeed in online images by metadata.Brigit knows by now very well what type of images work well, but she does not always use that. She still follows her own criteria that the projects must meet in order to be accepted.

Today’s design world needs more marketing than when she still worked in design and she misses to touch material, transform, give birth to something. But with designboom she might work as the same as before, she publishes people’s ideas without critics.
Her advice to upcoming designers is to bring creative energy for a long-term, long-run design project. Once again, design is not an easy task. It needs lots of energy and time. In the beginning from your crazy ideas to a certain point where your projects might be widely accepted by the society, you have to experiment and evolve.

Conclusion : Her design influence by Enzo Mari was very interesting. Doing a good job is not relevant today. Doing an intelligent, smart, scientific job is relevant. No-research can delay progress. Do not stop experimenting, exploring and having experience of new things. Then your ideas will have a higher project value. That’s why we need paperweights to look what’s here on the table now. And most importantly, start Instagram and post your moods. ;-) (for today’s design perspective.)

Sanghyeok Lee

KAIROS 11 – OBJECT 11

Object to bring: a rucksack

My Kairos was the moment I decided to go ahead with opening Berlin Glas.
I had the idea to open the studio in 2009, when I met a glass artist from Australia who was complaining that there were no opportunities for artists to work with the material in or near Berlin (it’s difficult for an artist who knows how to blow glass to work in a factory – the equipment is very different). He was going to set-up the studio with me, and so we founded Berlin Glas e.V. and looked for a studio.
A year later he and his partner split and he felt compelled to move back to Melbourne, leaving with a hot-shop that I had just ordered and was being delivered within a few months! That was my watershed moment: do I go ahead with this project, despite the fact that I myself am not a glass blower or artist?
The answer was yes…. and 9 years later, with the Corona crisis, similar questions have come up.  

ON Nadania Idriss

Nadania Idriss is founder and managing director of Berlin Glas e.V. and Berlin Glassworks GmbH. Born in Berkeley, California, Nadania has a specialization in medieval art and architecture of the Middle East. S
he worked at the British Museum in London, moved to Paris in 1997 to work at UNESCO, before moving to Germany in 2005. The programs she leads provide artist collaborations, classes for the general public, youth and refugee projects, artist residencies, and bi-lateral exchanges with international universities, as well as teaching a joint-university class with the UdK and KH-Berlin. Nadania is currently the Vice-President of the Glass Art Society.

www.berlinartglas.com 

Zusammenfassung 

Nadania Idriss // Kairos 11

The first KAIROS talk this semester started with the very interesting insight into Nadania Idriss’ work and her studio history of Berlin Glas e.V. – the first glass hot shop in Berlin.

For Nadania Idriss, there have been a few key moments in life where she was given the opportunity to experience a kairos – or as she called it, a ‘watershed moment’. Actually ‘the entire experience of founding the studio has been a ‘watershed moment’’, so she said. ‘It was about jumping into the deep end!’:
The key moment was in 2009, when her friend, with whom she was planning to run the first glass hot shop in Berlin, decided to move back to Australia while she already had ordered the whole equipment for the studio without a chance to cancel the order and without any knowledge about glass making.
The original plan was: he is responsible for the workshop, she is running a community program.
She decided to give it a chance and build it up on her own, everything based on her desire of working with a community. From that it grew into Berlin Glas, what it is now.

Today, she likes to share this kind of experience as she had founding the studio, starting with 0.
As she is actually more a person who likes to have a plan, she had to learn to work with her intuition and to let it go and grow. Since then, she likes to invite artists and designers to come without a plan and let it develop. Just like Prof. Axel Kufus who also did a one week residency at Berlin Glas. He told us about the special spirit of empowerment at the workshop.
She has drawn an interesting analogies to this experience of ‘jumping into the deep end’: Glass as a material and working with it is in fact unpredictable, too.
What is special about the studio is that the work in the workshops is focuses on the process, growing ideas and bringing these ideas to life. It is less about mass production than about giving designers and artists the possibility to work out their ideas to a perfect prototype and to search then, when needed, for a place where they can produce it in mass. Nadania wanted to bring to Berlin, what she experienced as normal in the US: Studio glass. When someone has an idea, she wants to be the place where you can give it a try and work it out.

The next kairos was the point when she started to work with Philipp Weber and created their lighting label Berlin Art Glas GmbH, what is, so Nadania, ‘more thought out’ and worked out for their best capacity. Philipp Weber, who used to work for Tomás Saraceno, and graduated from the UdK designed and made the award for the DMY awards with Nadania. The more he came into the studio, the more she wanted to work with him on a business level, appreciating the way he thinks.

Running, since 2015, Berlin Glas with half of it as a GmbH and half of it still as a charity, Nadania experienced her 3rd watershed moment during the corona crisis: They were confronted with the fact that they have more demand than they can actually supply. So BerlinGlas decided to expand the studio and to buy new equipment to grow further. They will be able to teach, produce works and have artists in residence at the same time in the future.
Rebuilding the studio, they want to install a system to save the heat and send it to their neighbours. Here she pointed out that the company’s focus is, even when growing, still on the community and their ideas and not on making money in short time.

Of course at this point, it was interesting to know how we as students and designers can get involved with Berlin Glas. Nadania has shown some possibilities.
For designers and artists, they have 3 types of residencies: Visiting artists for a longer stay, inviting artists like Axel Kufus for a certain period of time and working with art university students like in an erasmus scheme. For this, students should have experience with glass and work more like an intern in the team. They will learn making glass blowing molds out of plaster, thinking backwards in mold- object, making experiments in textures, translucencies, hollowness vs solid and so on.
However, you can also come with a finished mold and hire them to blow glass into the mold.

Talking about this, Nadania told more about this special part about having artists in residence: the exchange and seeing the material through that person’s eyes. Even in this thousands of years old technique there is always something new that they want to do and there is never the same thing twice! ‘We have that wow-moment all the time!’ she said. For her it is important to work with people from different backgrounds, that everything is mixed together and not to have a monoculture.

In the end we finally talked about the object we should bring: a backpack!
Nadania always appreciated her backpack. After opening the studio, she often had to run spontaneously to shops and grab things to get new ideas work and it was always put in her backpack. She feels like it is an extension of her body ;)
Nadania left us with the following advice about what she learned working 6 years at UNESCO: ‘No matter who the person is you speaking to, or who you might idealize or dream to meet- they are human like you! […] Don’t be afraid to contact them. Just gor for it!’

Kim Kühl